Skip to content
BeaconiXBlueprint

Enterprise Architecture

Enterprise Architecture

The practice, principles and governance model that ties every other reference domain on this site together — not a separate concern from the platform, but the discipline that keeps it coherent.

Principles

Eight principles the practice is built on

These principles apply above and across every domain — they are what the Architecture Review Board checks a decision against, not aspirational values on a poster.

Business-aligned

Every architecture decision traces back to a business outcome, not a technology preference.

Standards-based

Reference models and patterns are reused across the estate instead of reinvented per project.

Reuse before build

Existing platform capability is evaluated before any new component is commissioned.

Evidence-based decisions

Trade-offs are documented and justified — architecture decision records, not tribal knowledge.

Fit-for-purpose

Solutions are sized to the problem; gold-plating and premature scale are both treated as defects.

Transparent trade-offs

Constraints and compromises are stated explicitly, not discovered during delivery.

Federated ownership

Domain teams own delivery; enterprise architecture owns coherence, standards and guardrails.

Continuous evolution

The architecture practice — and the estate it governs — is expected to change, not freeze at a point in time.

Structure

Four TOGAF-aligned domains

Business, Data, Application and Technology Architecture each own a slice of the estate; Enterprise Architecture owns the coherence between them.

The four TOGAF-aligned enterprise architecture domainsEnterprise Architecture governs coherence across Business, Data, Application and Technology Architecture, each connected back to a shared governance hub.EnterpriseArchitectureBusiness Architecture
Strategy, value streams, organisation and capability — the 'why' behind every downstream decision.
Data Architecture
How information is structured, classified, governed and shared across the enterprise.
Application Architecture
The application portfolio and how individual solutions fit the wider estate.
Technology Architecture
The platform, infrastructure and identity foundation everything else runs on.

Governance

How decisions actually get made

Four governance mechanisms turn the principles above into practice, in the same principle / decision / implementation / guardrail / example format used across this site.

Architecture Review Board

Principle
Significant architecture decisions get independent scrutiny before commitment.
Decision
A standing board reviews and approves solution architectures at the Approve gate of the application lifecycle.
Implementation
Fortnightly ARB session; async approval for low-risk changes via a lightweight decision record.
Guardrail
No production landing zone or platform change proceeds without a recorded ARB or delegated decision.
Example
Contoso's ERP landing zone design was reviewed by the ARB before the first production workload moved in.

Principles & standards catalogue

Principle
Principles are written down, versioned and applied consistently — not reinterpreted per project.
Decision
A single published principles catalogue governs every reference domain on this site.
Implementation
Principles catalogue maintained as versioned content, reviewed annually or on material platform change.
Guardrail
New architecture decision records must reference which principle they satisfy or knowingly deviate from.
Example
The 'Private-by-default' platform principle traces directly to a specific Azure Policy assignment.

Architecture decision records

Principle
Why a decision was made matters as much as what was decided.
Decision
Material architecture decisions are captured as short, structured records — not buried in meeting notes.
Implementation
ADRs stored alongside the solution architecture, referenced from the Architect lifecycle stage.
Guardrail
ADRs are immutable once accepted; changed decisions get a new record that supersedes the old one.
Example
An ADR documents why Service Bus Topics were chosen over Event Grid for the order-fulfilment event.

Reference models

Principle
Common problems get a common answer, published once and reused everywhere.
Decision
Landing zone, integration and identity reference models are maintained centrally and versioned.
Implementation
Reference models published on this site and consumed by delivery teams at the Architect stage.
Guardrail
Deviation from a reference model requires an ADR and ARB sign-off, not silent divergence.
Example
Every landing zone in Contoso's estate inherits the same management group and policy reference model.